This is the third part of a series on the global deluge of Noah’s day. Thus far, we have seen the importance of teaching about the deluge, and that it’s more than just a Sunday school class for children.
Church 2022 looks significantly different from its recent past iterations, though even then signs of impending infection were not absent. Paul Aurich provides a review of the new book Failed Church by the Center for Cultural Leadership.
We’ve read his gospel account, but who was he? Who was Matthew, one of the twelve chosen by Jesus?
Joseph Boot’s “The Mission of God” is arguably one of the greatest philosophical-theological commentaries on public culture in the present century, and when unfair critiques are levelled against it, it is only fair to respond with the grace and truth of biblical wisdom.
Some Christian authors attempt to deduce that the Flood account was an exaggeration, and that it was only an isolated flood that affected the valley of Mesopotamia. We have it quite clear, however, that the biblical text does not permit such suspicions.
A skeptic happens to ask you about the veracity of the account of the global deluge and the Ark of Noah, when all you want to do is just share the gospel. How would you respond?
We give thanks because God is near. He is not a God that is distant. He is not a God that is far off. He is not a God made of human hands.
There is only one Sovereign who stands above all created things, only one King that rules above all the rest, His name is Jesus.
As Christian believers, we need to know, biblically, what the relationship should be between the Christian church and the State.
Paul Carter recently wrote an article for the Gospel Coalition entitled “Why I am not a Theonomist”. While readers will undoubtedly gain an understanding as to why Carter disagrees with the Theonomist position, the introspective manner in which he argues his points are unconvincing.